Branch and Product Performance
Compare branches and products across major Malaysian regions, and explain the changes.
Comparison
Each branch against its own trailing baseline, indexed to network movement
Each branch against its own trailing baseline, indexed to network movement
Branch network
iAbove baseline, over +3%Within normal rangeBelow baseline, under −8%Branches across major Malaysian regions
Revenue by region
iSKU contribution
iShareGross profit
MYR
MYR
Daily Balance Cleanser100.0%319k
Profit per unit against velocity
iHigh profit per unit · slowHigh profit per unit · fastLow profit per unit · slowLow profit per unit · fast
Low velocityGross profit per unit ↑ · Velocity →High velocity
Branch ranking
i#BranchRegionRevenuevs baselineTransactionsMargin
1KLCC, Kuala LumpurCentral+0.9%+0.1%62.0%
MYR 87,073
2Mid Valley, Kuala LumpurCentral−1.0%+2.0%62.0%
MYR 82,124
3Johor Bahru, JohorSouthern+16.4%+1.1%62.0%
MYR 67,032
4Georgetown, PenangNorthern−3.3%−2.5%62.0%
MYR 60,515
5Puchong, SelangorCentral+3.0%−0.5%62.0%
MYR 51,891
6Ipoh, PerakNorthern−7.2%+1.1%62.0%
MYR 37,583
7Kota Kinabalu, SabahEast Malaysia−1.9%−1.0%62.0%
MYR 33,859
8Melaka City, MelakaSouthern−13.4%−2.3%62.0%
MYR 33,124
9Kuantan, PahangEast Coast+3.4%+3.6%62.0%
MYR 31,899
10Kuching, SarawakEast Malaysia−4.1%−2.9%62.0%
MYR 29,498
Revenue and transactions are shown side by side deliberately. A branch whose revenue falls while its transaction count holds has an availability problem, not a demand problem, and the two need different responses.