Branch and Product Performance
Compare branches and products across major Malaysian regions, and explain the changes.
Comparison
Each branch against its own trailing baseline, indexed to network movement
Each branch against its own trailing baseline, indexed to network movement
Branch network
iAbove baseline, over +3%Within normal rangeBelow baseline, under −8%Branches across major Malaysian regions
Revenue by region
iSKU contribution
iShareGross profit
MYR
MYR
Daily Shield SPF50100.0%208k
Profit per unit against velocity
iHigh profit per unit · slowHigh profit per unit · fastLow profit per unit · slowLow profit per unit · fast
Low velocityGross profit per unit ↑ · Velocity →High velocity
Branch ranking
i#BranchRegionRevenuevs baselineTransactionsMargin
1KLCC, Kuala LumpurCentral+7.3%+0.1%63.3%
MYR 61,271
2Mid Valley, Kuala LumpurCentral+6.9%+2.0%63.2%
MYR 56,373
3Georgetown, PenangNorthern+0.7%−2.5%63.5%
MYR 41,809
4Puchong, SelangorCentral−7.9%−0.5%63.3%
MYR 30,919
5Melaka City, MelakaSouthern+17.0%−2.3%63.5%
MYR 27,327
6Ipoh, PerakNorthern+5.0%+1.1%63.5%
MYR 24,952
7Kota Kinabalu, SabahEast Malaysia+12.0%−1.0%63.3%
MYR 23,119
8Johor Bahru, JohorSouthern−37.9%+1.1%62.9%
MYR 22,820
9Kuantan, PahangEast Coast+0.1%+3.6%63.3%
MYR 20,246
10Kuching, SarawakEast Malaysia+4.5%−2.9%63.6%
MYR 19,491
Revenue and transactions are shown side by side deliberately. A branch whose revenue falls while its transaction count holds has an availability problem, not a demand problem, and the two need different responses.